When Can Police Legally Use Deadly Force?

Unarmed civilians, often of color, being killed by police is nothing new. But it is only recently that the stories are getting more attention from the public and the media. The stories often cause outrage when it is reported that the police officers who caused the killings are not charged. People wonder how this can be if the victim was unarmed?

The answer is that police officers are legally permitted to use deadly force if they perceive a threat, regardless as to whether or not the threat is real. Therefore, if a police officer reasonably believes that his or her life, or the life of another person, is in danger, then deadly force is permissible under the law.

In addition to "the defense of life" standard being a legally permissible circumstance in which an officer can use deadly force, an officer can also use deadly force to stop a suspect from escaping if the officer has probable cause to think that the suspect poses a dangerous threat to the public. And again, it doesn't matter if the suspect actually is dangerous, just that the officer reasonably believes this.

To take it a step further, the reasonableness standard is based on "objective reasonableness," which asks if the officer was acting reasonable based on the unique circumstances and how other officers would act in the same situation. Objective reasonableness is also fluid and changes as the circumstances change. 

Therefore, an officer might be legally permitted to use deadly force in one minute, but not the next if the situation, or his understanding of the situation, changes. For example, an officer who sees something in a suspect's hand that he believes is a gun may be permitted to use deadly force (depending on other circumstances), but if the officer then realizes that the item is not a gun but instead a hairbrush, deadly force is no longer permissible.

These standards were developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1980s and are the focus of many police brutality lawsuits. But, as Vox reports, activists are now broadening the issue and asking if policy should be focused on preventing the use of deadly force and not just trying to justify it after the fact. 

You can read more here on that topic. 


Why Clients Want Us

  • Thousands of Clients Helped

    We have helped thousands of clients with both small and big cases since the inception of the firm. Our attorney Matthew Weisberg has had the opportunity to fight for the rights of clients before the Supreme Court.

  • Affordable Pricing

    We are committed to providing transparent flat fees that are affordable. Everyone deserves the ability to fight for their rights without the worry of affordability.

  • Over 20 Years of Experience

    Since 2005 our firm has advocated for the rights of clients in Philadelphia and surrounding cities. In addition, our attorneys have been in the legal field for over 20 years bringing immeasurable knowledge with them to the firm.

  • Free Consultations

    We understand the stressful nature of the situation you can be in. Call us for a free consultation and we will strive for a response within 24 hours.

Start Your Free Consultation Today!

Defending Our Clients

See What Our Clients are Saying
  • “They helped me get my life back. I will always remember how empowered I felt after I testified and when the case was over (in my favor!).”

    - Robin R.
  • “When no one would take my legal malpractice case, they did and won!”

    - Doniell W.
  • “Weisberg Law was the only firm that took an interest in our racial discrimination case against a local school district.”

    - Kerry M.

Contact Us to Start Assisting You

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.